Today in class we dealt with a passage of scripture dealing with the first death in the Early Church. The teacher, and the class all seemed to imply that God was the one who struck Ananias and Sapphira dead after their sin. Let’s examine this
Acts 5:1-11
5 1 But a man named Ananias, with his wife Sapphira, sold a piece of property, 2 and with his wife’s knowledge he kept back for himself some of the proceeds and brought only a part of it and laid it at the apostles’ feet. 3 But Peter said, Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and to keep back for yourself part of the proceeds of the land? 4 While it remained unsold, did it not remain your own? And after it was sold, was it not at your disposal? Why is it that you have contrived this deed in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God. 5 When Ananias heard these words, he fell down and breathed his last. And great fear came upon all who heard of it. 6 The young men rose and wrapped him up and carried him out and buried him. 7 After an interval of about three hours his wife came in, not knowing what had happened. 8 And Peter said to her, Tell me whether you sold the land for so much. And she said, Yes, for so much. 9 But Peter said to her, How is it that you have agreed together to test the Spirit of the Lord? Behold, the feet of those who have buried your husband are at the door, and they will carry you out. 10 Immediately she fell down at his feet and breathed her last. When the young men came in they found her dead, and they carried her out and buried her beside her husband. 11 And great fear came upon the whole church and upon all who heard of these things.
Their sin was the result of their death, not God. I posed a question in class about the death being accounted to God, and the teacher stated it was implied. But I don’t necessarily agree. If you view God’s relation to us in a warfare model, fighting to bring good, and influence humanity towards redemption, we can view this entirely different. Satan, and Human choice influenced this story of the Early Church. Couldn’t it just as easily be seen as Satan and his influencers winning a battle with flying colors? The reason I thought this way is that, I’ve currently been reading through Gregory Boyd’s work, and it’s wonderful. He would propose that Satan won this battle, and the results were catastrophic. But he would also say that sin effected this as well, in a crazy sort butterfly effected this event. What degree of Satan and his influencers had compared to the butterfly effect of sin caused this event? We can’t know he says, and i agree. I think we just need to identify the event, and draw some conclusions in light of Jesus who is the perfect image of God.
1. God doesn’t kill people, or desire the death of any (Lazarus, Commands not to Murder)( I understand the OT may cause some problems with this conclusion, but the OT view of God must fit into the view of Jesus)
2. God works to the good of all those who believe in him. Ananias, and Sapphira were believers.
3. Satan is the ruler of this world ( So a lot of this crap needs to be attested to him)
4. Sin does effect us, and effects God’s influence in present day situations( if they had prayed about it to God maybe the event wouldn’t have been as bad or noticeable at all)
5. Jesus died for us, why would he Kill us( i know its the same as the first one but it just sounded good)
These are a few reasons why I don’t attest A&S’s death to God. And feel like it’s odd we as Christians are so adamant to attest killing and murder to God. Let me know your thought
In Christ,
Giles
Read Full Post »